Fleet Engineers earns win in U.S. District Court

Fleet Engineers, Inc., announced Tuesday it has earned a favorable judgment in the matter of Fleet Engineers, Inc., v. Tarun Surti and Mudguard Technologies, LLC (“Mudguard”).

In court documents, Fleet Engineers alleged Mudguard committed tortious interference with business relationships, while Mudguard counterclaimed patent infringement and breach of contract against Fleet Engineers.

Related

Minimizer debuts Western Star floor mats

Minimizer debuts Western Star floor mats

In an effort to keep Western Star trucks looking spotless, Minimizer has released five all-new Custom Molded Floor Mat kits. All five fit 2016-2018 Western ...

In the summary judgment decision, dated June 8, 2017, the Hon. Paul L. Maloney ruled that the Fleet Engineers AeroFlap does not infringe US Patent No. RE44,755, and also denied Mudguard’s counterclaims.

“We are pleased with the Court’s decision, which affirmed our longstanding belief that the AeroFlap did not infringe Mudguard’s patent,” says Wes Eklund, CEO of Fleet Engineers, Inc.

AeroFlap, one of Fleet Engineers’ many spray control products, replaces standard mud flaps, with a unique slotted design. Benefits of AeroFlap include increased fuel efficiency and reduced road spray, which saves money and increases safety due to increased visibility during wet conditions, Fleet Engineers says.

There are no comments

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *